Saturday, March 30, 2013
Friday, March 29, 2013
Let Us Give a Chance to Elections in Pakistan
In his public address
in Liaquat Bagh Rawalpindi on 17 March 2013 Dr. Tahir ul Qadri announced that
his party Pakistan Awami Tehreek will not participate in the coming general
elections. He vowed not only to boycott the elections but also to protest against
it by arranging sit-ins (Dharnas) throughout Pakistan on the day of polling on 11
May 2013. The rationale for this decision as given by him is that no electoral
reforms have been carried out, as was committed by the outgoing government to
him earlier this year, to make the election process fair, free, just, impartial
and clean from all corrupt practices. Dr. Tahir ul Qadri is of the opinion that
nothing good can be expected from the existing unconstitutionally-structured
Election Commission, which has not been empowered to introduce reforms and
implement them. As per his view, the forthcoming elections are being held to
protect the corrupt politicians who will be able to make their way to the parliament
once again through these elections.
The stance of Dr. Tahir
ul Qadri is correct and unambiguous. The way the Election Commission has framed
new nomination papers and code of conduct, is nothing more than eyewash and
will surely provide escape routes to the corrupt and inept candidates, who are
otherwise ineligible to contest elections under Articles 62 and 63 of the
Constitution of Pakistan. The components of this Election Commission are not
geared to carry out meaningful scrutiny of candidates. It is only a
revolutionary government installed with deliberate support of people that can
carry out ruthless and across-the-board accountability. However the decision to
boycott the elections, particularly asking the public to do the same, has its
own demerits.
Dr. Tahir ul Qadri has
worked very hard to inculcate awareness among people and educate them on
provisions of the Constitution. Now even a common man is aware of the contents
of Articles 62, 63, 218 and knows what the elected representatives are bound to
deliver under Article 34 once they are elected to form the government. Now was the time for people to come out en-mass
and fill the polling booths for casting their votes in favor of clean and honest
candidates. Despite corrupt practices by the traditional politicians and Election
Commission overlooking these violations, a very large turnout on the day of
polling can make a pleasant difference. The silent majority which hitherto-fore
had been abstaining from voting can play a very decisive role in electing the
new faces and better candidates. On the other hand if a large population abstains
from the electoral process there is danger that the corrupt political mafia
will bring their cronies to the polling stations and become victorious even
with a small turnout. The decision by a large number of followers of Dr. Tahir
ul Qadri to “Vote for None” will therefore damage the clean and honest
candidates and indirectly help the corrupt political mafia.
The decision to boycott
the elections seems to be erroneous. The protest in the form of sit-ins
(Dharnas) on the day of polling is therefore not likely to create a substantial
impact. This may be seen in the backdrop of the fact that collective wisdom of
the people of Pakistan has already decided in favor of bringing a change through
the ballot. This is the reason why people have not protested en-mass on the
streets against the PPP-led government despite the worst kind of sufferings
during the 5-year tenure. They were seeing a silver lining in the elections to
get rid of the government. They still have a hope in the coming elections,
though they may stand disappointed at the end of the day. I am of the opinion
that elections must be given a chance to change the destiny of the country. A better
strategy of protesting against the corrupt electoral system by Dr. Tahir ul
Qadri and his followers would be to turnout at the polling stations in largest
possible numbers wearing black bands on the arms, and cast their votes for the
change. The followers of Dr. Tahir ul Qadri are imbued with the spirit of
change and would never like to vote in favor of the corrupt candidates. But if
they are motivated by their leaders to vote for the catalysts of change they
can act as a force multiplier. However the people of Pakistan reserve the right
to protest against the election results if they prove to be rigged.
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Monday, March 18, 2013
THE CONCEPT OF SOVEREIGNTY IN ISLAM
As per the Islamic and Quranic teachings the ultimate and absolute
sovereignty is vested in Allah. His sovereignty was handed down to the
Holy Prophet (SAW) in the form of manifested sovereignty (for the
purpose of implementing it in social and political life of a society).
In today’s world when the Muslim Umma
has been divided in geographical boundaries to form various countries,
this manifested sovereignty has been transferred to the people of these
Muslim countries as a SACRED TRUST. This sovereignty was not transferred
directly either to the states or to the governments or even to the
parliaments of these countries.
The people of Pakistan, where the population is over 1800 million, are now having the ownership of this sovereignty as a sacred trust. Since the population as a whole cannot possibly perform the sovereign (administrative, executive, legislative, judicial etc) functions of the state, they have to elect their representatives who perform these functions on their behalf. The people of Pakistan are thus duty-bound by the command of Allah to return His sovereignty (which was transferred to them as a sacred trust) to their representatives, who will now be the TRUSTEES of that sovereignty.
Allah commands people in Quran (Aya 58 of Sura Al-Nisa):
The people of Pakistan, where the population is over 1800 million, are now having the ownership of this sovereignty as a sacred trust. Since the population as a whole cannot possibly perform the sovereign (administrative, executive, legislative, judicial etc) functions of the state, they have to elect their representatives who perform these functions on their behalf. The people of Pakistan are thus duty-bound by the command of Allah to return His sovereignty (which was transferred to them as a sacred trust) to their representatives, who will now be the TRUSTEES of that sovereignty.
Allah commands people in Quran (Aya 58 of Sura Al-Nisa):
إِنَّ اللَّـهَ يَأْمُرُكُمْ أَن تُؤَدُّوا الْأَمَانَاتِ إِلَىٰ أَهْلِهَا وَإِذَا حَكَمْتُم بَيْنَ النَّاسِ أَن تَحْكُمُوا بِالْعَدْلِ ۚ إِنَّ اللَّـهَ نِعِمَّا يَعِظُكُم بِهِ ۗ إِنَّ اللَّـهَ كَانَ سَمِيعًا بَصِيرًا
“ No doubt Allah commands you to render trusts to whom they are due, and when you rule among the people, rule with justice. Excellent is that which Allah instructs you. No doubt Allah hears and sees (everything).”
This Aya sets the foundation of a political system to be established in an Islamic state. People are the custodians of the sovereignty given to them as a sacred trust and they are constrained by Allah to return this trust to persons who are capable to hold this trust. Those persons (trustees) will then run the affairs of the state with justice, in accordance with the principles of Quran and Sunnah. In earlier days of Islam (during the tenure of Four Caliphs), people used to transfer this trust to the Caliphs through pledge (بیت). In today’s world of knowledge, enlightenment, awareness and democracy, this exercise can be done through voting, referendum, opinion polls or whatever system is deemed appropriate.
The relevant Articles of the Constitution of Pakistan as read in conjunction with the above mentioned command of Allah makes the social contract between the people of Pakistan and the State of Pakistan very clear. Both have their specific duties to perform and obligations to discharge.
Participating
in electoral process (or any such activity that leads to transfer of
sovereignty to the state through chosen persons) and casting vote in
favor of persons who are 'Trustworthy' and 'Truthful' is compulsory as
per Quran. Those who abstain from this process on any pretext will be
willfully withholding الْأَمَانَاتِ against the explicit command of
Allah. The people of Pakistan from all strata of society should be
educated on these lines. This is the only way to get rid of the
exploiters and looters from coming to power.
Akhtar Malik
18 March 2013
Thursday, March 14, 2013
History of Soft Revolution in Pakistan
Imran Khan, Chairman Pakistan Tehreek e Insaf
Public Meeting in Lahore 30 Oct 2011
History of Soft Revolution in
Pakistan
Over the past few
decades the collective wisdom of the masses in Pakistan has seemingly decided
in favor of a soft change instead of a bloody and violent revolution. Though it
is a slow process but is likely to have deeper and more sustained effect on the
society. Despite the efforts of the forces of status quo to keep the social and
political indolence in place, the catalysts of change are actively heading
forward with a steady pace.
The First Soft Revolution came in the shape
of Freedom of Media. Media, both
print and electronic, had started its efforts to break the shackles of the
state restrictions during the late 1990s. Interestingly it was during the reign
of a military ruler, Gen Pervez Musharaf, that the media acquired its optimum
freedom. Since then media has played a vital role in creating awareness in
society, analyzing the political situation, exposing the social evils of
corruption, lawlessness, favoritism, apathy of the government officials and
molding the public opinion in favor of a progressive, peaceful and a just
social system. Though the powerful political mafia, who wants to keep the
masses ignorant, is all out to coerce, intimidate and pressurize the media to
get them in their favor, the media is showing commendable resilience and
steadfastness in achieving its objectives. With the passage of time media is
likely to be more vibrant, impartial and effective in transforming the society
in to a better shape.
The Second Soft Revolution occurred in the Restoration of Independent Judiciary. The incumbent Chief Justice of
Pakistan, though one time a beneficiary of Gen Pervez Musharaf’s PCO and a supporter
of his unconstitutional rule, asserted himself in 2006-07 by taking a pragmatic
stand on issues like Steel Mill, missing persons and sugar scandal etc. His
removal from the apex appointment of Chief Justice Supreme Court by Gen Pervez
Musharaf led to a vigorous movement by the legal fraternity. Soon this movement
swelled beyond proportions in which various political forces also joined. Their
aim was to remove the President and restore the dysfunctional chief justice,
who was then being seen as a symbol of independence of judiciary and justice at
national level. The enforcement of emergency, suspension of constitution and
arrest of judges by Gen Pervez Musharaf on 3 Nov 2007 proved as last nail in
the coffin of his rule. Movement for restoration of judiciary became a popular
national movement that ultimately achieved its objective when the dysfunctional
chief justice along with his other companions was restored in March 2009.
Since its restoration
the superior judiciary has, by and large, played its role effectively. For the
first time in the history of Pakistan, a sitting government was dealt with
according to law, whereby even Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani had to go home
for not obeying the Supreme Court orders. An independent judiciary is entirely
a new phenomenon in social and political environment of Pakistan, where the
powers-that-be are finding it difficult to come to terms with this change. This
was the reason why a large number of court orders were never implemented by the
government. Despite all the limitations and handicaps, the independent
judiciary is coming up well. Like media, the judiciary is also not likely to forfeit
its hard earned freedom in coming days. An impartial and independent judiciary
is crucial to the sustainability of democracy and progress and prosperity of
the country, and it is really a big achievement.
The Third Soft Revolution that is making
its headway is the Electoral Reforms
Process. Since democracy is the only acceptable political system in today’s
world, the elections play a pivotal role in shaping the political and social
structure of a country. If the electoral system is faulty, corrupt, tilted in
favor of the people with nuisance values and does not provide a level field to
all the contesters- as is the case in Pakistan for the past six decades- the
result will be total chaos, confusion and destruction. Without reforming the electoral
system the same breed of corrupt politicians will keep coming to power again
and again and the country will not see any hope of progress.
Imran Khan of PTI was
the first politician in the present times to kindle this ray of hope to the
hapless people of Pakistan. He provided an opportunity to the people to elect
an alternate leadership that would replace the custodians of present rotten system,
who are occupying the citadels of power. Dr. Tahir ul Qadri of Minhaj ul Quran
International provided further impetus to this movement by launching a long
march and a sit-in in Islamabad in favor of electoral reforms. Though his
efforts met vehement resistance from the forces of status quo, he has been able
to make deep impression in the minds of people. The people now stand well
educated about various provisions of the constitution and have better knowledge
about their own rights and the obligations of those who are voted to power. There
is a general craving in the public for conducting meaningful elections. They do
not want to do this exercise just for the sake of it and as a ‘business as
usual’. That is the reason that despite intense defiance from the ruling and
opposition elite, the Election Commission and Supreme Court are being obliged
to comply with the aspirations of the people. However this revolution is still
in progress and will see its culmination, if the next elections are conducted after
requisite reforms.
Akhtar Malik
14 March 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)